Individual articles not part of a series.
Reflects on the internal struggle against self-censorship and the debilitating voice of an inner critic. Chronicles the journey of dismantling this barrier to cultivate a mental space for free expression. Marks a pivotal decision to publish work in defiance of perfectionism and fear.
Narrates a tense dining experience that highlights the friction between personal ethics and social expectations. Explores the internal conflict and cognitive dissonance experienced when unspoken values clash with established norms. Illustrates the often uncomfortable compromise required to maintain relationships across ideological divides.
Investigates the inherent limitations of written monologue compared to the dynamic nature of interpersonal dialogue. Discusses the ethical risks of static publication, including potential misinterpretation and the inability to adapt to shifting cultural contexts. Frames the act of writing as a necessary leap of faith to foster connection across time and space.
Contrasts the inherent human tendency to judge with the conscious effort required to understand. Argues that while judgement provides stability and safety, understanding opens the door to new perspectives and deeper truths. Concludes that both are necessary but serve different roles in navigating existence.
Questions the underlying motivations for meat consumption, proposing that beyond cognitive dissonance and ideology, there may be a darker impulse to inflict suffering. Suggests that animals serve as convenient targets for human cruelty and that understanding this drive is key to preventing further abuse.
Explores subjectivity through the metaphor of a bright red room as an inescapable reality. Examines how art becomes a coping mechanism for eternal conditions and demonstrates how perspective itself is fundamentally flawed through multiple visual metaphors of skewed angles, impossible arrangements, and inherent imperfections.